The Neighbourhood Disputes about Plants Act 2017 (the Act) establishes a cost effective, efficient and accessible statutory scheme for the resolution of neighbourhood disputes relating to plants.
The Act outlines the responsibilities of landowners in respect to plants. These include
The Act outlines processes for neighbours to resolve issues or disputes that arise in relation to problem trees, hedges or other vegetation in a reasonable and amicable manner. Where such disputes may not be resolved amicably and in the absence of a satisfactory solution, an affected landholder may have redress under the scheme in the following circumstances
Substantial, ongoing and unreasonable interference with the use and enjoyment of land may include severe obstructions to views and sunlight.
The Act provides that those entities which are deemed to be land owners and who therefore may have responsibility for plants under the Act include
The Act does not apply to plants that are situated on land that is defined as excluded land. This includes
The Act also does not apply to:
Under the Act, parties are first required to make reasonable attempts to resolve a plant dispute informally.
Where possible, parties are encouraged to resolve matters informally and the affected landholder may request the plant owner, either verbally or in writing, to take action to ensure the affected land is no longer affected.
However if the matter is not able to resolved through this process, the affected landholder may give the plant owner a notice. The two main notices under the Act are a Branch removal notice (DOCX, 28.6 KB) and a Notice about land affected by plant (DOCX, 24.1 KB). It is recommended that affected parties use the template notice forms for these notices.
Inquiries about the informal dispute resolution process may be directed to the Legal Aid Commission of Tasmania telephone advice line on 1300 366 611.
A landholder of affected land may give a Branch removal notice (DOCX, 28.6 KB) to a plant owner if a branch from a plant
The branch removal notice must:
A plant owner may give a notice in writing (response to branch removal notice) contained within the Branch removal notice (DOCX, 28.6 KB) to the affected landholder specifying:
A permission in a notice to enter affected land does not include:
A second notice may not be given to the owner of the same plant within a 12 month period, unless the owner has changed.
If the plant owner does not remove the overhanging branches on the specified date, the affected landholder may sever and remove the branches and may, but is not required to, return the branches to the plant owner. However, the affected landholder is not authorised to enter the plant owner’s land to remove the branches.
The plant owner is liable for the reasonable expenses of the affected landholder in severing and removing the tree branches or arranging for another person to sever and remove them, but only to an amount that is not more than the prescribed maximum amount, this is currently $500.
The affected landholder may recover the amount from the plant owner. The plant owner may apply to a magistrate to determine if the expenses that are sought to be recovered by the affected landholder are fair and reasonable, and the magistrate may determine another amount.
A landholder who is affected by a plant that is situated on another area of land may give notice in writing to the owner of the other land. The Notice about land affected by plant (DOCX, 24.1 KB) is to specify the grounds on which the affected landholder believes the land is being affected, specify the action that should be taken by the owner and request the owner of the land to respond in writing within a period (of not less than 14 days), specified in the notice.
It is the land owner’s responsibility to consider public liability insurance before giving a person permission to enter his or her land.
It is the land owner’s responsibility to consider a contractor’s insurance before engaging a contractor to carry out work on a plant.
The Act also recognises that informal disputes resolution may not always be possible and sets out a range of circumstances that may be considered by the Resource Management and Planning Appeal Tribunal. For example, if threats of violence have previously been made, where restraint orders are in place or where parties have already participated in alternative dispute resolution.
If disputes are unable to be resolved by informal dispute resolution, the Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear and determine disputes. Further information, including information about searching the database, application forms and fees, and practice directions issued by the Tribunal are available on the Resource Management and Planning Appeal Tribunal website.
Section 16 of the Act requires an owner seller of land to give a copy of any application and any additional information filed with the Tribunal, or a copy of an order to a prospective purchaser before entering into a contract of sale for the land. If the seller fails to do this without reasonable excuse, he or she commits an offence and may be liable to a penalty.
A Person selling land to give buyer copy of application or order template form (docx, 18.4 KB) may be used for this purpose.
It is also an offence if the owner seller of the land fails to notify the Tribunal as soon as practicable after a contract of sale is entered into, that the prospective purchaser is joined as a party to the application.
A Notice of additional party template form (DOCX, 24.6 KB) may be used for this purpose.
Section 17 of the Act provides that if a prospective purchaser of land is not given a copy of an application or order before entering into a contract of sale for the land, the prospective purchaser may terminate the contract of sale before settlement by giving a notice to the owner or the owner’s agent.
A Notice of termination template form (DOCX, 24.1 KB) may be used for this purpose.
If the contract of sale is terminated, the owner must refund the deposit to the prospective purchaser within 14 days. It may be an offence if the owner fails to do so.
If the person who holds the deposit fails to refund the deposit to the prospective purchaser immediately after being directed by the owner to do so, the holder of the deposit may commit an offence.
If a contract of sale is terminated by the prospective purchaser, the owner seller of the land and the person who was acting for the owner who prepared the contract of sale, if there is one, may be jointly and severally liable to the prospective purchaser for reasonable legal and other expenses incurred by that person after that person signed the contract of sale.
However, if the owner of land or person who prepared the contract did not know or ought not reasonably be expected to know that the owner was given a copy of an application or order, that person may not be liable for the reasonable legal and other expenses incurred by the prospective purchaser.
An owner who sells land and who at the time of settlement has not carried out work that is required to be carried out by an order, is liable to carry out any outstanding workif the owner did not give the prospective purchaser a copy of the order before the parties entered into the contract of sale.
An owner of the land must not restrict the person from ensuring the work is carried out.
If you wish to seek private legal advice about the scheme or wish to find a lawyer, please refer to the Law Society of Tasmania website.